<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Copy and Paste Bug Finally Fixed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/</link>
	<description>Otaku Software Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-11948</link>
		<dc:creator>James Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/#comment-11948</guid>
		<description>

Hmm, looks like they haven&#039;t worked out all the kinks yet. More frustration to follow, I guess. I don&#039;t know if the AutoCopy extension has something to do with the bug, I haven&#039;t tested it. I&#039;ll look into it.

At this point I&#039;m absolutely sick and tired of Firefox: they&#039;ve been coasting since the release of v1.5, and the development team seems more interested in wasting time prototyping new bookmarking systems and various other &quot;cool&quot; features than actually fixing major problems. And when users do report a major problem, (such as the terrible caching scheme that causes Firefox to use GBs of memory after extended use), the development team just seem to brush them off. I&#039;ve personally switched to Opera, and recommend it to anyone who&#039;s looking for an alternative to IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, looks like they haven&#8217;t worked out all the kinks yet. More frustration to follow, I guess. I don&#8217;t know if the AutoCopy extension has something to do with the bug, I haven&#8217;t tested it. I&#8217;ll look into it.</p>
<p>At this point I&#8217;m absolutely sick and tired of Firefox: they&#8217;ve been coasting since the release of v1.5, and the development team seems more interested in wasting time prototyping new bookmarking systems and various other &#8220;cool&#8221; features than actually fixing major problems. And when users do report a major problem, (such as the terrible caching scheme that causes Firefox to use GBs of memory after extended use), the development team just seem to brush them off. I&#8217;ve personally switched to Opera, and recommend it to anyone who&#8217;s looking for an alternative to IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meskibob</title>
		<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-11942</link>
		<dc:creator>Meskibob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/12/09/firefox-copy-and-paste-bug-finally-fixed/#comment-11942</guid>
		<description>Using FF 2.0 and TD 1.4.2 (full) I still have this issue.  Could it have something to do with using the AutoCopy extension?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using FF 2.0 and TD 1.4.2 (full) I still have this issue.  Could it have something to do with using the AutoCopy extension?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
