<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired &#8211; Paying for software is bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/</link>
	<description>Otaku Software Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-11808</link>
		<dc:creator>James Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/#comment-11808</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, and I&#039;m not arguing that free software is a bad thing. As I said, I can see the point marking down a product when it&#039;s too expensive or isn&#039;t as good as cheaper/free alternatives. I don&#039;t agree, however, with marking down software simply because it costs money (notice the reviewer didn&#039;t present any qualifiers such as &quot;It&#039;s bad that it costs money because the open-source alternative is just as good&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, and I&#8217;m not arguing that free software is a bad thing. As I said, I can see the point marking down a product when it&#8217;s too expensive or isn&#8217;t as good as cheaper/free alternatives. I don&#8217;t agree, however, with marking down software simply because it costs money (notice the reviewer didn&#8217;t present any qualifiers such as &#8220;It&#8217;s bad that it costs money because the open-source alternative is just as good&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stas</title>
		<link>http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-11804</link>
		<dc:creator>Stas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2006/11/18/wired-paying-for-software-is-bad/#comment-11804</guid>
		<description>Well, when compared to other software that does *exactly* the same thing, but is free (as in beer) -- or better yet, free (as in speech). then yes, cost is a minus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when compared to other software that does *exactly* the same thing, but is free (as in beer) &#8212; or better yet, free (as in speech). then yes, cost is a minus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
